The Meaning of Children is divided into three parts, featuring stories with protagonists who are children, in the parenting years, or elders. Though I wish it were otherwise, many of the book’s stories are dark, reminding me of that Tolstoy maxim “All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way,” and its corollary, “If it’s happy, it’s not literature.”
Growing up, without the rose coloured glasses. To paraphrase Katie Hewitt in The Globe and Mail, these aren’t
the wonder years.
But reading a book is like taking a Rorschach test: what you get from
it is deeply entwined with what you bring to it, with who you are.
Which brings us to The Bad Review. Writers are usually
admonished to ignore The Bad Review (hopefully, there will only be one!) and
focus on the good, and there is much wisdom in that advice. I have also been
blessed to have received so much wonderful, positive feedback. But there is
also much to be learned from the negative review…and so, despite the kerfuffle
between Michael Lista in the National Post and CWILA, based on the earlier call and response round between Jan Zwicky and Zach Wells, I believe in writing, reading, and acknowledging, the bad review. And
so, here is a discussion of mine.
Bee
Markus oversimplified terribly when she wrote
“what the fourteen stories in Akerman’s collection do is describe the myriad ways
that mothering and marriage can damage and destroy a woman’s soul and spirit.”
(B.A. Markus, mRb, vol. 14, no. 3,
Summer 2011. Reproduced below; archived here).
There’s
no doubt in my mind “that mothering and marriage can damage and destroy a woman’s soul and spirit (emphasis mine).”
Not always, but sometimes. The thing is, my work doesn’t shy away from that. My
book takes on the female experience, leaving behind the rose-tinted glasses.
Maybe, deep in the heart of the mothering years, it can be hard to appreciate
what, exactly, one is sacrificing. Maybe a little denial is not a bad thing.
But (in my opinion)
there is much more in the book than what Markus saw; maybe the review says as
much about her as it does about the book. That she saw the child point-of-view
stories as introducing “the mother as a resentful victim” completely misses the
point: that to grow up is to peel a series of layers of knowledge gleaned from
experience. That growing up doesn’t end with an eighteenth birthday. It’s a
lifelong trip.
Markus’s
real problem may have been with the paperback’s cover: all those happy photos
suggesting a light-hearted tiptoe through the parenting tulips. This was my
publisher’s choice, part of the Faustian bargain that must be struck between
gaining the reader (and, more importantly, the bookseller marketing
department’s) interest and giving the flavour of the contents. I love the
paperback cover and gave it my blessing, though I also warned it might lead to exactly
the sort of reaction Markus appears to have had: the suggestion “that the
stories behind the cover will most certainly be heart-warming vignettes
celebrating the innumerable gifts that children bring to our lives.”
Several
women, some “of a certain age,” as we say here in French, actually commented
that the book was so much better than they thought it would be, based on the
cover. They’ve had enough of the saccharine view that a woman’s life is
consummated by motherhood. Which is one reason why I had a problem with Richard
Wright’s Clara Callan, where Clara’s
inner life, as represented in the series of letters she’s been writing, ends
with the birth of her child.
I heartily acknowledge that my book probes the dark hearts of
growing up and of mothering, but I also feel that the book as a whole is a much more balanced
portrayal than Markus—and mRb--let on.
Happily-ever-afterish stories do appear: “Paternity” and “The Woman with Deadly
Hands” spring immediately to mind. What I’ve tried to do is to show you my 14
snapshots of life, with compassion. And without glossing over the hard parts.
So, there you have it. My take on The Bad Review. Of course, every writer should be grateful for every single review, good, bad, or indifferent. It means that serious readers seriously considered your work. Which is what every writer dreams of...or, at least, what this writer dreams of.
Thankfully, there are a number of other, much more positive takes from
reviewers and other readers. You may find many of them here.
The Meaning of Children is available as a paperback (~$15) or an e-book ($5). Decide for yourself.
No comments:
Post a Comment