Millions of pixels have already been spilled on the Jody Wilson-Raybould SNC-Lavalin deferred prosecution brouhaha. Lines are being drawn, flamethrowers are being taken to the place, talking points are being honed to rapier edge, petards are being hoisted…you get the drift.
The essential question, though, is whether SNC-Lavalin deserves to be forced out of business (or out of
for the actions of a corrupt few related to contracts in Libya between
2001 & 2011?
That's 54,000 jobs, 9,000 of them in
vast, overwhelming majority of these employees (not to mention shareholders)
are totally innocent. Given the above, Jody Wilson-Raybould is wrong and Justin
Trudeau is right.
Ministers either toe the party line or quit. That's not what she did. She didn't quit when she was being subjected to "pressure," and she still hasn't quit after trying to incinerate her government.
Loyalty is everything in politics. The PMO was only asking her to do what was in her rights to do, by virtue of her position. For the good of the country, she should have.
Spirited conversations are taking place on my Facebook page, and other places. I understand those holding the opposite position. The thing is, this is politics, “the art of the possible,” not abstract morality class.
Don't get me wrong, I agree that the individuals who committed wrongs should be punished, just not the entire economy. The PM would be derelict in his duty to let it go under. It's a jewel in
Canada's economic life, one of the
largest engineering and construction companies in the world.
I'm actually more concerned that the penalties being handed down to the guilty are too lax.
But what did JWR think she was getting into, in becoming a politician? She should stick to the PTA if she can't handle the big leagues. Why didn't she quit when she was being pressured, if she thought it was so wrong?
Basically, this scorched earth/woman scorned campaign of hers proves (to me, at least) she is not cut out for government.
JRW herself has said “that while she believes she was inappropriately pressured, she doesn’t think any law was broken,” according to Chantal Hebert in the Feb. 28th Toronto Star ("Trudeau’s waist deep in the big muddy," p.4).
Politics is serious business and no doubt has a steep learning curve. Of course having a deferred prosecution law on the books means the government would want to use it. That is what laws are: tools to goose the art of the possible.